The theologian and atheist have an affair.

Tuesday, September 2, 2025

Recently, I’ve watched debates between theologians and atheists. The atheists exhibit the art of non-confrontation, something Jesus taught. In one interview with Richard Dawkins, the world’s foremost atheist, he is peaceful, secure, non-threatened. His Islamic interviewer, however, is confrontational and wants to show Dawkins who’s boss. But Dawkins won’t take the bait. In A Course in Miracles, it states, “anything that can be threatened isn’t real.” If you can be threatened, you lose your credibility. The Islamic interviewer blew it. Why do the theologians lose their shit so fast? Why be so insecure if your belief in God is secure?  

Sam Harris, another avowed atheist, never raises his voice or gets flustered. He too won’t allow religious interviewers to threaten him. His implied body language says, “Your God is weak, flaccid.” Dawkins brings a Mormon to a puddle in one interview, stating The Book of Mormon was nonsense. The Mormon writhes in anger saying, “ I take great offense.” In another panel discussion, I watched Jordan Peterson and go at it with an atheist. I thought the two of them would rip each other’s clothes off and screw each other’s brains out. Theirs is a secret love affair.

Do you want to be turned into a threat? Become insecure and take offense. Dawkins and Harris love pointing to truth, science, and reason. They would crawl onto a cross and die for its sake. Our saviors – science and reason, brought to you by their secret identity-builders and implicit lovers – the theologians.

To be credible, be relaxed and attentive, clearly unthreatened. “Point” to truth with flaccidity in body, yet with “erect,” direct, and clear focus in mind and spirit. Neutral, male and female together and secure. The theologian has a leg to stand on – the atheist. They prop each other up in a secret love-making affair. Be careful who you turn into the enemy. That turns you into the implicit aggressor.